Jan 09

Well, the keynote is done and the major sites have all the updates. The key products include:

iPhone
(Shipping in June)
Far beyond any expectations, the iPhone was a serious power hit. I mean, this thing is so far beyond what I expected I think anyone else that tries to announce a portable media device is going to just have to crawl in a hole and die. Seriously, nothing is even close.

iTV
(Shipping in Feburary)
Now you can take iTunes beyond the desktop, beyond the laptop, and beyond your pocket. Put it directly on your big screen TV with the new iTV.

Airport Extreme
(Shipping in Feburary)
While not officially mentioned, the new network base station to complement today’s news.

So far, Mac Mini upgrades to Core 2 Duo, Mac Pro upgrade to Quad Xeon, and a few other expected items are MIA.

Dec 11

If Apple falls short of having a full-screen display with touch-bezel technology for the v6 iPod, then they need to at least scale the size of the display to reach that of the Zune. A 3.0″ (or slightly larger) screen would help market some of those videos. Without going full screen, Apple will have to stick to the 4:3 aspect ratio in order to leave room for the scroll wheel. If they do that, they should add the easy ability (perhaps using an orientation sensor) to rotate the display for landscape viewing (either lefty or righty friendly, considering the symetrical nature of the iPod controls).

This would make watching widescreen adaptations of television programming enjoyable instead of the greatly reduced visuals we get today with the 2.5″ screen. The best portable experience I’ve had with HDTV-sourced programming has been watching CSI:Miami on a Sony PSP (using PMP Video @ 480×272 native). The only problem with the PSP is you need darkness to enjoy it since the display is so reflective. But the depth of colors was amazing.

So wake up Apple and give us a bigger display, even if you can’t muster the full front panel.

Dec 10

With the release of the Zune, music sharing has become available on a portable device. However, the implementation is pretty weak — at least in my opinion. The 3×3 rules, while seemingly sensible, do not really address the real benefit of wireless. Apple already has a wireless protocol with Bon Jour (previously Rendezvous). A multicast method of identifying and communicating with remote music-enabled devices, Bon Jour is what enables you to share iTunes libraries and play music remotely on the Airport Express.

With the new iPod, Apple should add 802.11b/g (including an on/off switch, buried deep in the menu system of course) and allow it to participate in ad-hoc (for unit-to-unit sharing) as well as infrastructure networking. Once network enabled, the iPod could use the same protocols that iTunes uses for music sharing allow the iPod to see music shared on desktop computers at home (like an iMac, Mac Mini, or a Windows desktop), other iPods in the area, and some of the network network attached storage systems (NAS) such as the DNS-323 from D-Link.

The iPod would also have the ability to locate and use remote speakers just like iTunes. Not only should this work with the Airport Express, but any iTV device that Apple releases. In fact, I’d like to be able to stream to a Mac Mini attached to my HDTV system via the optical output in that device. Since the Mac Mini is potentially an iTV box on steroids, it should be treated like any other iTunes enabled device on the network. I guess streaming to the PC should also be allowed (while running iTunes, allowing music to be routed through the speakers).

All of these streaming features would be great, but there could also eventually be network-enabled car stereos that could be used as remote speakers using Bon Jour. This would seriously help establish the audio playback and audio control protocols used by iTunes as a defacto standard. The protocol is open and tools exist to build utilities to remotely control iTunes, it would just be a matter of time before you could remotely control your car stereo from your iPod. Not to mention play your music library on your iPod from your car stereo.

These consumer-oriented features really wake-up the iPod to make it a more social experience (no cliche intended to the Zune) and could really bury the competition until they license the patents from Apple to make their players play nicely on the shared network. By using some tricks to keep power consumption low (such as reduced transmission power, low power sleep modes, etc.), battery life could be reasonable and even unchanged if the user simply turns it off.

Dec 10

By adding wireless to the iPod, Apple could enable a number of additional markets for the iTunes music store. Being able to use an iPod without a computer enables a large number of people that cannot afford to have a computer system or the bandwidth to download music to use the iPod for their music. However, trying to implement something like the graphical interface of iTunes on a small iPod screen seems unreasonable given the lackluster history of Internet surfing on the small screen (think Treo, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile).

The market for such a feature is not your regular computer user with a broadband connection. As such, the market cannot be addressed by something that complicated. So I propose the following solution: The iTunes Music Store within a store. Take your average shopper at Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Circuit City, or whatever your local flavor happens to be in your town. A customer browsing the CD rack should be able to power up their iPod, enable wireless, and connect to the Wal-Mart kiosk network.

While connected, they can browse a remote library of music that is available on the CD rack (just like browsing a remote iTunes library with another instance of iTunes). If they decide they want to buy a track or two, they can do some magic on the iPod to indicate their purchase intentions, swipe their pre-paid iTunes music subscription card, and walla, the track is transferred to the iPod. Wal-Mart gets a small cut and the customer walks out happy without having to use a computer to rip and copy their music. They could easily offer the option of regular (128AAC) or lossless (ALC) for different price points (say the current $.99 for the AAC, and $1.29 for the ALC), or $9.99 for the entire disk ($12.99 for lossless).

There is a certain fear that such a change could impact the bottom line at Wal-Mart. However, for most users getting the tracks off their iPod is not likely and they still can’t burn it to CD or play it in their car (without buying more iPod accessories, and we know that is where the mark-up really exists). They have an unlimited virtual inventory of music on release date without having to stock an abundant supply of disks and loss-leader pricing. This could really change the marketplace for music, particularly as more folks more towards the iPod route.

Another great way to offer tracks would be enabled by allowing iPods to share their library just like iTunes on the desktop. If a bunch of us sitting at the coffee shop could listen to each other’s libraries, we could find a song we like (that was previously bought on the iTMS) and buy our own copy of it. This would eliminate the need to browse the entire iTMS on a small device, and eliminate the bandwidth of people listening to 30 second clips on their portable devices. It might even be possible to add the ability to buy a song with the same album name/artist name/song title (or the entire album), but there is some luck involved there since they aren’t able to directly link the actual track to an iTMS purchase.

There are likely a bunch of other marketing scenarios that come into play with a wireless-enabled iPod. I’ve offered the above as market-reasons why it should be added compared to the obvious “consumers want it so make it so” mentality. There are a ton of more consumer-oriented reasons to add wireless, which I’ll cover in another post.

Nov 25

With services such as mobile broadband, high-bandwidth mobile phones (possibly including even the upcoming iPhone) and fast upload speeds on cable modems (over 768Kb), it’s about time for Apple to go back to the original feature that was part of iTunes 4 — remote access to the music library.

Earlier versions of iTunes allowed the library to be shared by any IP address, a feature that was later changed to only allow access within the same network subnet. This makes it impractical to remotely access your iTunes music library since you would have to VPN into your home network to make it work. And even then, you’d add the burden of encryption to your pipe making it hard to get enough bandwidth for Apple Lossless. So I want a way to remotely access my iTunes library while at work.

Why not just load it on my iPod? I have over 140 GB of music in my iTunes library, all in Apple Lossless, all ripped from my original CDs. The majority of my library is ripped from original content, with only maybe 50 actually iTunes purchased tracks. Why? Because I only use the iTMS for songs I only want one or two tracks from a CD where I don’t care about the audio quality (think top 40). The audible difference between CD and AAC is easily distracting for ambient/electronic music with a quality pair of earphones (I listen using the Shure E500′s). In fact, some of the tracks I’ve purchased on iTunes I ended up ordering from the publisher in Europe only to eliminate the compression artifacts that come with the AAC download from iTMS.

Sorry, got off on a rant there. Anyway, I want to be able stream the pure, original lossless audio signal out my cable modem to my desktop at work, where I can listen in pure fidelity. I often load a percentage of my library to the iPod, but I often find myself wanting to hear something that I didn’t load up due to space constraints.

Apple, please give us what we want, something that the other hardware providers have already made available with things like the SlingBox have already done — remote access to our content.

Nov 25

AppleInsider reports that the 8GB black Apple iPod Nano trails the pack in sales. While it is easy to say this is because it is the same price as the 30GB hard-drive based iPod, I think that misses the point. Black is boring. Black is out. Nobody wants a black iPod. I would almost bet that the new PRODUCT (RED) 8GB is outselling the black model. Why? Nobody wants black.

I’ve considered buying the 8GB unit in RED because it would not be black. I only want the 8GB unit. Why? Because double the storage is worth the extra $50, but not worth the black premium. I do NOT want a black iPod, I think it is a lame color for an iPod. I want it in blue, red, green, anything but black.

Wake up Apple, ship the 8GB in colors and watch the sales of 8GB nanos increase. Drop them to $229 and they’ll go up even more. Until then, I’ll wait for the full screen video iPod.

Oct 18

I got excited for a second when the Apple Software Updater actually popped up and told me that there was a new software update available. That is until I actually realized that it wasn’t an update to any software, it was an update to the updater. What a joke!

Continue reading »

Sep 13

iTunes 7

iPod Comments Off

So Apple dropped iTunes 7 on Tuesday, offering up a new set of features to enhance the whole user experience gig. Here are some of my favorites:

  • Download cover art for all music, not just iTunes purchases.
    Since I ripped most of my music from CD in Apple Lossless, it is nice to automatically get the cover art without resorting to external utilities to find it.
  • Album view
    The album view with the cover art on the left and the track information on the right is choice.
  • Better QuickTime support
    The new QuickTime engine has better (albeit different) handling of higher sampling frequencies available with the Intel HD Audio renderer. In fact, I had to make some adjustment (including dropping back down to 16-bit) to get this to work. Hopefully they will tweak this and make it so that 88.1 Khz 24-bit playback is once again possible.

There are many extra features that really help out and make it easier to use. This is a solid release, so grab it.

Oh, yeah, it does movies too but I don’t really care until they have a full-screen iPod with a decent size display. Until then, they can have them.